![]() The HBM provides a systematic framework suitable for the proposed research. The health belief model (HBM) was applied as the theoretical framework for a multiple case study which examined the question: How are the cybersecurity risks and threats related to wireless implanted medical devices being communicated to patients who have or will have these devices implanted in their bodies? The subjects of this multiple case study were sixteen cardiac device specialists in the U.S., each possessing at least one year of experience working directly with cardiac implanted medical device (CIMD) patients, who actively used cardiac device home monitoring systems. While it is apparent from the literature WIMD cybersecurity is a shared responsibility among manufacturers, healthcare providers, and patients what explained what role patients should play in WIMD cybersecurity and how patients should be empowered to assume this role. ![]() However, this rapid growth has precipitated an equally rapid growth of cybersecurity risks and threats. Because of their many benefits, these devices are experiencing dramatic growth in usage, application, and complexity. Wireless Implanted Medical Devices (WIMD) are helping millions of users experience a better quality of life. This research contributes scientific data to the body of knowledge in the field of WIMD cybersecurity and assists scholars and practitioners in advancing education and research in the field of healthcare cybersecurity. The information gathered from healthcare professionals who work intimately with a highly vulnerable WIMD patient population (cardiac device patients) provides valuable insights for medical device manufacturers, healthcare providers, policymakers and patients across the WIMD macrocosm. ![]() Through the application of Thematic Analysis (TA), this study yielded five themes: the influence of the media on patient cybersecurity awareness the need for risk/benefit analysis at all levels of patient interaction a culture of non-communication in the healthcare field and the medical device industry the need for collaboration and education among manufacturers, providers and patients and the obstacles and challenges present in all phases of patient care. By using semi-structured interviews with expert cardiac device specialists, the ideas, experiences, and perceptions of healthcare professionals responsible for the cybersecurity awareness and education of WIMD patients were examined. The sample was sixteen cardiac device specialists in the U.S., each possessing at least one year of experience working with WIMD patients who used in-home cardiac device monitoring systems. This multiple case study examined the following question: How are the cybersecurity risks and threats related to wireless implanted medical devices being communicated to patients who have or will have these devices implanted in their bodies? The population for the study was cardiac device specialists at surgical hospitals and medical centers across the United States. ![]() But what is not clear is what role a patient should play in WIMD cybersecurity and how a patient can assume such a role. ![]() It is clear from the literature that WIMD cybersecurity is a shared responsibility among manufacturers, healthcare providers, and patients. Yet, this rapid growth has precipitated a rapid growth in cybersecurity risks and threats to these devices. Because of their life-saving benefits, these devices are experiencing a dramatic growth in usage, application, and complexity. Wireless Implanted Medical Devices (WIMD) help millions of device users experience a better quality of life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |